Germany experienced a period of political Essay

policy-making root, spd cant agree, Hindenburg causing worrys, insufficiency of cooperation between parties causing polarization but no out skillful revolutions that happened during 1919-24, growing foreign relations lorcano/conformity of berlin Economic using, result of lorcano meant breathing space from reparations also dawes and young cast and rentenmark dawes plan buy uped US money lead to make up in capital. after though fulfilment still causing problems and unemployment pay is causing issues, increase in taxes Social procession, conservative right unhappy and manifests in literature and cinema expressing glory in WW1 contrasts with neue sachlichkiet modern Weimar culture, Bauhaus linking art and functionality.Highlighting favorable issues within Weimar Overall relative calm but lack of ramp up, frugal development but in short terminus and social progress but non helping Weimar. The geezerhood 1924 to 1929 are often exposit as the Golden years but it is debata ble to what extent Germany in truth experienced political calm, economic development and social progress during this metre. surely there was non the turbulence of post-war Germany and the consequences of the crippling Versaille Treaty were not as harsh in this accomplishment but this does not mean it was a time of development and progress.It can be suggested that it was not a period of political calm, there was certainly a lot of tenseness between the various political parties that do up the many spinal fusion governments in this period, the failure of so many governments alone suggests that there were forbidding political issues. The narrowing of the interests of each party meant that it was becoming increasingly effortful for effective compression governments to be formed. The SPD were especially difficult in this time as they were against compromising with the bourgeois parties as they felt a spay in ideals would occur and proposed policies like the Heidelberg Prog ramme which would see private monomania of industry be taken over by social owners. seemingly many parties from the left felt this but the SPD had the largest amount of seats in the Reichstag, over 150 at their peak in the 20s, and wherefore had the ability to put the government into a stalemate. The SPDs inability to compromise makes the political stage even worse when Hindenburg is elected as professorshipin 1925. Hindenburg, being a veteran of the Franco-Prussian war and the general who won the battle of Tannenburg was already conservative and took as many steps as he could to reduce the military unit the SPD had. Hindenburg also believed the powers of the president should be worked up and even blocked a draft that would limit his ability to persona Article 48. This incoduscive atmosphere meant that by the time the SPD were willing to cooperate with a coalition government, individual interests and polarisation of parties had developed and no one else was interested. thereo f this cannot be classed as a period of political calm repayable to the stagnant political system.However, it could be suggested that this tension is to be expected as people are still feeling the effects of the setoff introduction War and political calm could be defined by the lack of extreme political parties attempting to take over. When this era is compared to the years 1919 to 1924 it is by outlying(prenominal) a time of political calm as there were no outright attempts at revolution. The years before saw extreme right and left wing idealists try to take over and the fact that this was not attempted during the golden years meant it was a time of relative political calm. This is not to mention the successes in Stresemanns foreign policy, which put Germany spikelet on track to becoming a serious European power once again. The admittance of Germany into the league of nations and the signing of various treaties, such as the Lorcano treaty, meant Germany were in a period of pol itical calm not experiencing the diplomatical humiliation of the years before.The various treaties signed by Stresemann also helped the economic development in this period. The Dawes gained significant investments from the US and the Young Plan trim down the reparations Germany would have to pay, and set a timescale for how long they would have to pay. This gave the country most breathing space to repair and develop its own economy. The young plan, for example, minify the amount they would have to pay by 1700 million marks than they would in conjunction with the Dawes plan. These plans, alongside the introduction of the rentenmark meant there was an increase in German capital in this period, which can certainly be classed as a period of economic development.Whilst there is definitely evidence of economic development in the mid-1920s it did also experience financial issues. The increase in unemployment, 15% of the workforce were unemployed by 1929, put a heavy strain on the welfar e system of Weimar Germany. The institution for paying unemployment benefits had to borrow money from the Government, 342 million reichsmarks, and the parties could not agree how to find this money. The SPD would increase taxes tour the DVP would cut benefits. This can be seen as a backwards trip in economic development, as the system did not address the problem of unemployment, but just found more money to pay it, with the finis of how to pay for the unemployment benefits was delayed until 1930.This can be seen as the government close to shooting themselves in the foot and making a short term fix for a long term problem. This short-sightedness can also be argued to be found in Stresemanns policies, for borrowing money from the US. An international financial crisis would leave over-dependant-on-America Germany in a high amount of debt, which is what happened when the mole Street Crash occurred. Therefore it can be said that these years were a period of economic development, bu t that there would be light long term effect on the country from these developments.Social progress is probably the only contention that can be absolutely hold with, with very influential movements like the Bauhaus dominating this period of time, summed up as Neue Schlachkliet. This movement, saw a progression in modern views and an attempt to soften the Weimar government by exposing the issues faced through literature, theatre and film. The need for educational and social reform was healthful documented and although this did not bode well for the Weimar government it definitely showed progress in attitudes of the general public. The conservative record of many Germans could still be found and also classed as a social progress in the form of anti-democratic writings and films that promoted the glory of the First World war. The two social ideas both grew in this period, but incomplete celebrated the Weimar Government so whilst it was undoubtedly social progress it was not produ ctive for the Weimar republic.There is definitely a case for political calm, economic development and social progress in the mid-1920s but they were not necessarily the advancesthat would warrant the term golden years. The political calm was only due to a lack of serious opposition to the government but still they could not successfully form an effective coalition government and whilst the economy did improve in this time the provisions made were short-sighted and the country was over-reliant on foreign investments. Whilst social progress was made in this era it is easy to see that the progress wasnot in the name of state and presented the Weimar government with future problems as popular ideology differed from what they promoted.