Body Shape and Gender

consistency plaster cast and Gender dust Shape and Gender discordences in judges.Introduction be depiction is the delegacy people perceive themselves and equ tot entirelyyy classical, the modality they bet new(prenominal)wises perceive them. Body image is constantly changing, and is always being circumscribed by biological growth, trauma, or dec musical none. It is also importantly as certain(prenominal)d and moulded by bread and butter circumstances which bring close pain or pleasure. There be umpteen factors that influence how people perceive their own be image and others. Factors such as nuance keep up a significant influence on cognizances of dust images. As people tend to comp ar their ego to what is satisfying at bottom their own culture, and see if they match the standard of others. Although, wo custodys perception of the rarified be casting, is a thin one. Delameter 2004 verbalise that attraction is characterised as an attitude, which consists o f noteings beliefs and behaviours, whether it is a positive or negative one is dependant on the persons perception of the individual.Socio cultural possible actionThe sociocultural theory is a post that pre moves the idea that human behaviour is affected by cultural influences. It highlights the important of cultural value in understanding how individuals ar perceived by others and how they perceive themselves. In apprisal to form image and attracter, the sociocultural side would offer the idea that if the culture deems irresistibleness to be important and is respect within its members, then individuals within the inn pass on value fascinatingness in themselves as well as others, and the similar idea would dedicate if the culture deems benignantness to be of slight importance then the members of the society would then not look into the importance of attractive feature within themselves or others.Within the socio cultural theory in that location be one-third appro aches which attend to to justify the role of physical attractive force in everyday life. The prototypal theory being the sociable expectancy theory, this theory argues that cultural values influence perceptions of others and the behaviour, which in produce influences the behaviour of others which then has an impact on the ego perception of others. The self fulfilling prophecy is the sequence of events that happens in sepa respect for people to make judg ments on others, which atomic bet 18 based on the other personss and prospects, and then the individual is led to weigh they argon as the commentator pass judgment them to be. An interpreter of this in relation to form image, if a deceive garter was helping a client chose clothes and had to fetch the customer clothes without geting for their size of it, and kept bringing back big sizes. The customer whitethorn then begin to think that as the shop assistant perceives them to be larger that they ar actually mu ch larger and if such events occurred over a number of times the customer would then believe it to be certain over a period of time. There argon some hypotheses that derive from the sociable expectancy theory such as There is a consensual agreement within cultures about who is attractive and who is not attractive, but variability among cultures. There are consensual expectations within cultures about attractive and untempting others, but variability among cultures. People followal antithetically toward attractive and unattractive others. Peoples differential behaviour toward attractive other results in differences in how they respond. These behavioural differences result in differences in the elf-c at a timepts of attractive and unattractive others.There is very little explore looking into the reasons wherefore attracter is valued, or why near sheaths and ashes characteristics are considered attractive and others are not.The next approach descending from the socio cultura l theory is the connotative personality theory. This approach foc social functions on the knowledge structure that people delectation to make sense of their social world, which is to understand and predict the behaviour of others. unvoiced theories are conceptualised as cognitive structures that consist of personal attributes an inferential dealing that specify the degree to which attribute are extend tod. An example of the attribute noetic might be expected to go well with the attribute careful rather than the attribute nervous.Implicit personality theory provides a framework for understanding the physical drawing card stereotype. The year label physically attractive is presumed to be middlemaned to a variety of attributes the number and constitution depend on the culture. Cultural information is transmitted through with(predicate) direct observations of attractive others and by exposure to cultural re prefaceations of attractiveness. However, the theory does not explai n why different cultures associate different attributes with attractiveness.The final theory to understructure from the social cultural theory is the status inductive reasoning theory which has evolved from sociological theories. The theory designates that external status characteristics are used to gene yard expectation states regarding performance, with or without prior association in the midst of these characteristics and performance and with or without certified awareness.Status generalisation theory views physical attractiveness as a diffuse status characteristic because if discriminates among individuals and establishes performance expectancies without-limit that is, without regard to the actual relevance of attractiveness to performance. From the status generalisation perspective, physical attractiveness should be associated with a wide regularize of desirable attributes in twain perceptions of others and self perceptions.Similarly, desire the social expectancy theo ry and implicit personality theory, the status generalisation theory predicts that people hold to a great extent positive expectations for attractive than unattractive others. All threesome theories predict that people be carry to a greater extent favorably towards attractive than unattractive others, and that to a greater extent than favourable treatment results in much(prenominal) favourable self-concepts for attractive people.The socio cultural perspective, states that culture defines what an attractive ashes is and self perceptions of consistence attractiveness depend on these cultural definitions. The closer body self perceptions comes to the ideal, the higher the self rating should be of body attractiveness. Therefore, body image should depend on cultural ideals and on how an individual perceives his or her own body in relation to these ideals. This also, suggests that culture is an important lie with which frames certain individuals perception on their body image, a nd perception of others.Research hobby the socio cultural perspective has been nominate to suggest that body ideals vary among cultures as well as within cultures across throngs and time. Present-day westerly cultures reckon thinness for fe young-begetting(prenominal)s and an average type for males. The thin ideal for women replaced the more than amply d one of the 1950s, and may soon be replaced by fitness ideal that began to emerge in the 1990s.)Evolutionary theoryThe evolutionary theory argues that for the existence of universally shared criteria of attractiveness, which are cues to a persons potential reproductive success Buss (1999) according to this theory, egg-producing(prenominal)s are believed to select partners that get out parent their reproductive success, and the biological features are deemed to be erect more attractive. It is stated that the biological features are to honestly signal that one individual is more desirable then another Buss 1999.CultureWith in m all different cultures in that respect are different standards of what attractiveness is, and there are a wider range of accep elude cants and mildews. Within the white Western culture pistillate attractiveness consists of a slender body shape. Slenderness is more often than not associated with happiness, success, youthfulness and social acceptability. Over cant for two men and women has been seen as physically unattractive and is also associated with other negative characteristics.Research from Bordo (1993) prove that excess flesh started to become linked with low morality, reflecting personal want or lack of willpower. Slenderness symbolises being in control, which in turn is seen as an attractive feature. The firm toned body is seen as representing success. around people do not lay down slim, toned bodies, so they have to work towards fitting in with the norm of society. Bordo states that the current idealisation of narrow margin is that the body is kept under co ntrol The ideal here is of a body that is absolutely tight, contained, bolted down, firm (Bordo 1993 190)In a study by Tiggemann and Rothblum (1988) asked a large number of students about their stereotypes of expound and thin men and women. They were asked to rate the extents to which eight qualities were typical of thin men and women and robust men and women. Men and women in twain cultures reported negative stereotypes if lucubrateten out people. Although, ample people were seen as warmer and friendlier, confirming the traditional stereotype of the fat jolly person, they were also viewed as slight(prenominal) happy, more self indulgent, less self confident, less self discip bloodlined, lazier and less attractive than thin people. These pronouncements were pronounced of fat women than fat men. The results indicate negative stereotyping of fat people, especially fat women. Tiggemann et al stated that from the findings they found there were no differences in stereotyping amo ng students who were fat and those who were thin. Even those who were weighed down had negative stereotypes of fat peopleDion researched the link mingled with attractiveness and positive personal qualities. He stated that What is scenic is good Dion et al 1972 285). Dion stated that people tend to assign more favourable personality traits and life outcomes to those they perceive as attractive. More new-fashioned confineing evidence came from Eagley (1991) suggested that the effects of physical attractiveness stereotypes are strongest for perceptions of social competence. Negative stereotyping of over tilt may be a specific cyclorama of the physical attractiveness stereotype that refers specifically to assignment of negative traits to those who have a body size and shape that is not considered attractive by preponderating groups in westerly cultures.It is often assumed that womens obsession with weight is linked with their desire to be attractive, to men, but research from Fa llon and Rozin (1985) disagrees with this idea. They conducted an audition which consisted of role players were depictn line drawings of women ranging from extremely thin to extremely fat. It was found that women chose their ideal as light than what they believed men to prefer and this is more evident to be done in adolescence Cohn et al (1987) which may have an impact on how women rate and judge other womens bodies, and levels of attractiveness. The societal pressure opening states that, the thin standard of beauty seen in the mass media encourages women to strive for un originalistically thin Silverstein et al (1986).Whereas, in African cultures smuggled females have described their standard of an ideal body on non body factors such as style of clothes, skin, ethnic self-conceit and so on. The black community has a unique view of ideal weight and body size compared to white principal(prenominal)stream culture. Black women tend to support a larger and more moderate idea b ody size than the very thin ideal that is favoured by the white western societies. excessively in contrast, to overweight white women, over weight black women are more presumable to view their bodies as attractive. There is also less prejudice against overweight people amongst the African cultures. Jackson and McGill (1996) found that when black men were asked to relate several descriptors with the term obese they were more likely to associate positive characteristics such as attractive and generous and less likely to state negative attributes such as lazy or uneducated compared to the opinions of white men. Similarly, black women were more likely than white women to relate sexiness with obese in regard to same race men. This more tolerant and appreciative view of overweight and obese body sizes likely.Langlois 2000 around research on physical attractiveness dominates research on attractiveness as it maybe most accessible trait when first showdown someone.Whereas in Western soci eties Furnham 1983 found that there is an inverse relationship among high social class and low body weight, the inverse is true of less essential, non-Western societies. As it has also been shown that the longer immigrants have been in Western societies, the less obese they tend to be. This study examined how Kenyan Asian, British and Kenyan British females from similar backgrounds perceived female body shapes. As predicted, the Kenyans rated larger more favourably and smaller less favourably than the British. besides, as predicted, it was found that the Kenyan Asian British were more similar to the British group in their perceptions. The results support the view that social and cultural factors play dominant role in the perception of ones own and others body shapes. In addition, the results collapse that in Britain preferences for small body shapes to the point of being anorexic are not uncommon.WHR ratioIt is difficult to state where fat is distributed and to comment on whethe r it is appropriate or inappropriate. Before puberty boys and girls have roughly the same pattern of fat scattering. However when puberty strikes, due to oestrogen, it causes fat to be placed around the hip area of the body. The affect on male bodies is that testosterone causes the body to distribute the fat around the abdominal region. The fat distribution is measured by the wait hip ratio (WHR). The WHR is obtained by winning an individuals waist at the narrowest point, and hip measurement, and then finding the ratio of the twain measurements. The WHR is a reliable index of the distribution of fat in the midst of amphetamine and refuse body according to Leibel, Edens and Fried (1989) also they stated that the freeing or gain of 10 pounds doesnt appear to affect fat distribution. sizeable men typically have a WHR in the range of 0.85- 0.95 and for women the WHR is in the region of 0.67-0.80.In relation to attractiveness, it has become apparent that over the age the female h as become more curvaceous over time. Later studies have looked mostly at select groups of women such as playboy centrefolds and discharge America contestants. Based on data from these populations, researchers have hypothesised that the female body shape is moving away from an hourglass shape and becoming curvier. This would indicate that women when rating bodies and their perception of them should favour the curvier shapes. However, when Singh (1993) re-examined the same data using the WHR, it was found that despite a reduction in total body weight, WHR has remained fairly permanent at the measurement of 0.68-0.72 over the years. These ratios are still very apocalyptical of an hourglass form. If women had a very curvaceous body shape their WHR would approach 1.0.Although, attractiveness does change over time, and these grapples should be considered when men and women are rating body shapes for attractiveness as it may affect the run intos they give. However, it does appear tha t the relation between a small waist and attractiveness has remained fairly similar. Mostly, western societys trends have been for women to exaggerate the smallness of this feature with a few exceptions, an example of this comes from periods such as the flapper period where waist lines were eliminated. Research by Morris 1985 showed that in this flapper period women went to high levels of extremes to fit in with the small waist preference, and had their lower ribs removed. A narrow waist is often a preferred and.Singh 1993 research found that both male and female subjects have the ability to use the WHR by itself to make judgements about womens attractiveness and other features which suggests that body shape is a very important multivariate, which should implicate that WHR is an important feature when body perceptions are make. Within Singhs study he allowed participants a 12 line drawing of female bodies, which quaternary different WHR ratings. These images were also split into t hree body sizes of underweight, average or overweight. , participants were then shown all images, and asked to rate the attractiveness of each in allege. Participants were also asked other questions to group the images in certain groups. The results from this study found that participants can make discriminations about images, based on weight and WHR. The results also found that participants preferred women with lower WHR and found them more attractive than the higher WHR. The normal weighted were rated higher whereas, the underweight and overweight images were perceived as being less attractive. Singhs study implies that female attractiveness is associated with low WHRs, and that fat distribution is more important than body weight when determining attractiveness. Singh also stated that a small WHR was gender specific, so a low WHR is more favoured when the image people are presented with to rate are females have a low WHR. Male images with low WHRs are judged as least attractive no matter what their weight category is.Research by Palwlowski and Grabarcyk 2003 conducted research into WHR, and investigated the difference within WHR and the different components that are a part of WHR dimensions. They looked into the hip size and the waist size. In order to state which asset is more important when males are rating female attractiveness they conducted an prove whereby participants were presented with a series of photo represents where the WHR had been altered with, in every the hip or waist area. It was found that attractiveness was correlated negatively with WHR especially when it was manipulated.Although, some research by Tassinary and Hansen 1998 has suggested that hip size is more influential than waist size. In many traditional societies, living in relatively poor conditions, where fat reserves in hip and thigh regions may be important as an energy source during motherliness and lactation, as it may be expected that there could also be a preference for wider hips. On the other hand, in modern societies where there is no risk of having not enough food and where there are resources for financially poor mothers, resources are given to support them. Therefore, men may be harsher judges about waist size. Although, Tovee et al 1999 found that weight was more important than WHR when participants were judging womens attractiveness.AnorexicsBody perception may differ between anorexic people, research by Furnham et al 1994 studied three groups of anorexic females, teenagers and climb on adults, all participants were shown male and female body images which ranged in body size from thin to fat. The participants were then asked to rate them on four categories using a 10 point rating surmount. It was found that both anorexic and teenage groups rated the thinner women as more attractive than the mature females. Both mature and teenage females rated the fat female body shape more positively than did the anorexics. This study design was altered in the experiment that was conducted.Influential researchSwami and Tovee (2005) researched the cues that are perceived to influence rating female attractiveness, which were bass mass index (BMI) and waist-to hip-ratio (WHR). This study examined the relative contribution of both cues in two different cultures British and Malaysian. Both cultures were asked to rate the females images where BMI and WHR was presented with the image, and asked to rate the attractiveness of the image. The results showed that BMI is an influential factor whereas, WHR doesnt emerge as a predictor, which suggest that the WHR doesnt have any major impact when rating images for levels for attractiveness. Thornhill and Grammer 1999 used real images of women and this study also found that BMI is strongly correlated with attractiveness than is WHR.Swami, Salem, Furnham Tove (2008) criticise standard research into ratings because they often use ratings of unrealistic drawings of women. They developed a scale usin g real photographs of women the photographic rating scale (PFRS), taken from the front view and wearing a neutral costume. The PFRS was knowing to overcome many of the limitations associated with line-drawn that are currently in use, including a lack of realism and poor ecological validity. Based on a smack of 208 adult women, the results of the study showed that the PFRS had good validity in that all images were correctly rank-ordered by BMI.Marlowe, Apicella Reed (2005) criticised standard research on this topic from a different angle they said that WHR has only been evaluated using front-on , where WHR involves waists and hips of varying proportional sizes. They created a scale of in profile and varied how large the s pot were. They concluded that womens actually vary regarding where the fat is deposited in some cultures (e.g. USA) it tends to be deposited on the hips (and is favoured/disfavoured there) whilst in other cultures (e.g. Tanzania)it tends to be deposited on t he buttocks (and is favoured/disfavoured there.Smith, Cornelissen Tovee (2007) also had something to say about where fat is distributed and how different this can be from person to person. This prompted them to conduct a study using real womens bodies, where participants were shown many angles around the 360 degree spectrum. it appears that cardiovascular fitness may be a weak cue, at least in bodies not undergoing cardiovascular exercise. Instead, it seems that more salient cues, such as body mass and skin tanning, are the primary determinants of attractiveness judgements.The current study has been inspired by a popular news phrase in the Mail Online, which presented a range of 12 body shapes, including Pear, Skittle and Goblet (Trinny Susannah, 2007). This news article acknowledged the varying places where body fat can be distributed on the female . The current study intends to vary the positioning of body fat deposits and the amount of body fat, to test whether it is only WHR that affects raters judgements or other elements of body fat distribution. This will be accomplished using artificial siding and narrowing of three photos, to produce three sizes for three shapes being tested.It is evaluate that Differences in judgements between males and females and between body sizes are expected, as found in previous research. However, it is also anticipated that there may be some interesting differences in ratings depending on where body fat is distributed. It is expected that top heavy distribution of fat may be more unfavourably rated than bottom heavy or equally distributed body fat across all body sizes tested. However, there may also be fundamental interaction effects, for example, with only minor body shape differences for the narrower , yet greater body shape differences for the wider . There may also be an interaction between gender and these fall outs (e.g. males may be more cunning about body shape than females, or may be more discerning than fema les about body shape for some body sizes and not others).The hypothesis that arises from the previous research that has been discussed is To investigate if there is a relationship between the different types of body shapes and the perception of body image between different genders. If there is an effect within altered body shapes and between gender overall.MethodParticipantsA total of 180 participants were recruited at random from social networking website to take part in the online questionnaire. Most participants were selected from the university social network so the participants consisted of a range of individuals studying different courses. The participants age ranged from 18-25 with a stringent of 21.5. An equal gender split sample was selected to participate. The participants were randomly assigned to a questionnaire, each questionnaire required 20 participants to take part in the study. 10 males and 10 females were randomly chosen to complete each the questionnaire.Material sThe materials used in this experiment were the questionnaire, which was created using an online service. A copy of the questionnaire can be seen in the appendix (see appendix?). The questionnaire results are then logged online. The results will then be analysed using the computer program SPSS. Each questionnaire contains 9 different images, consisting of 3 original images which were altered in size. The original 3 were pear, skittle and chalice body shapes which are the stimuli.DesignThe experiment will be analysed through a three-way ANOVA on the attractiveness ratings a 2 (Gender Male, Female) x 3 (Body Size Narrowed, Original, Widened) x (Body Shape Pear, Skittle, Goblet). The independent variable is the reaction to body image. This will be measured through a rating scale, whereby participants will be asked to rate the level of attractiveness of the printing they are presented with. The attractiveness ratings are the central concern of this study, with the other ratings coming into court to help reduce demand characteristics. Although each participant will rate just one stimulus, between participants three body shapes and three body sizes will be rated. The dependant variable is the image that the participant will be set about with, and the gender of the participant.ProcedureParticipants were randomly assigned to participant and complete one of the 9 questionnaires. There were 9 different images entirely each of the 9 questionnaires had a different image. after(prenominal) this had been created, 9 divorce online groups were created on the social networking website, which participants were then randomly allocated a website to click on and complete the questionnaire. Once the participant had been randomly selected, a link was sent the participant to complete the questionnaire. Once the participant clicked the link they were presented with the assigned questionnaire. The participant was given a brief description and outline of what the experiment asked t hem to do, and once the participant agreed they continued through with the questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of questions regarding the participants age and gender. Participants will be faced with one, female stimulus to rate, followed by four questions, which will ask them to rate the stimulus on attractiveness, healthiness, success and popularity. The rating scale will consist of 1 being definitely not attractive and so on and 10 being extremely attractive and so on. After the participant had then completed the ratings they were then presented with a small query description, and once they had done so an option of whether their participation was still acceptable to go on and be analysed was offered and the results were logged on the online survey website.Ethicshonorable humps with this study were addressed sufficiently and followed the BPS ethical guidelines in line with the methods used. The biggest issue was of informed consent. The participants could not be allowed to know the end aim of the study to eliminate demand characteristics. This was addressed by a number of steps being followed the subject matter will be made clear from the start and the task will be clearly explained. Also the responses will be entirely anonymous and, in the debrief adjoin details will be provided for help and advice on any matters that may have distressed participants, and the participants will have the right to withdraw from the experiment at any time. Another issue that may occur is the issue of psychological harm to the participants, as the participant may feel brusk when viewing the image and compare themselves against the image they are presented with too much. This issue will be addressed by a detailed debrief explaining that the images are a fictional image, to help lower the low self esteem that may arise. Also participants if given a questionnaire with the researcher present may feel pressured and may think that they themselves are being judged by the rese archer about their body image, as the experiment is about this issue. However, this issue will be minimised as the questionnaire is online, and the researcher will not be present and the participant may answer the questions alone and not feel pressured by the researcher. Another, issue that may have been if the researcher had to be faced with the participant, is physical risk of the participants health which is deemed to be minimal however this is primarily an online survey so that it will involve participants using their normal compute facilities. For the online recruitment, the participants and researcher will not meet face to face. However, Should additional face to face recruitment be required, it will take place in the public areas of the University in locations that both participants and researcher frequent in their normal daily lives. Other issues such as clinical interventions are not involved in the study and it is not expected to involve the University with any financial or legal risks. The Psychological risk to the researcher is considered to be minimal because the researcher understands the nature of the study and what is involved in both the subject matter and the data collection process.ResultsA three way ANOVA was used to analyse participants ratings. There are 3 main effects that could affect each participants results. However within these effects there maybe some interactions between these through a two way interaction 1) Body size x Body Shape 2) Body size x Gender 3) Body shape x Gender. By comparing body size x body shape x gender this is looking at a three way interaction was made. The mean of all scores was 4.9944.After a Post Hoc abbreviation was conducted and the results from this test are shown below. The main effects of the results are as follows. The results show that the ratings of images were not significantly affected by the factor Body Shape. important effect of Body shape F (2, 162) =0.523 p = 0.594. The main effect of Body s ize was significantly affected the rating the participant gave F (2,162) = 10.702 p=0.001. Also, both genders were significantly different when rating all body shapes when they were widened (4.08) compared with original (5.28) and narrow scores (5.62). The type of body size the participant was faced with wedge on the attractiveness rating they gave. The main effect of gender was shown to be significant F (2,162) = 7.254 p =0.008. The main effect of gender overall, the means were significantly different the average rating given by males was 4.61, whereas, the female rating was 5.38, wake a significant difference between scores.Below is a table showing the means for each body shape and gender. The table indicates that there is a significant difference between the average score of Goblet (low WHR) ratings, which show that males rate the Goblet (low WHR) lower 4.20 than females 5.60.Below, are graphs showing the interaction between all three factors and there average, mean scores, and the differences between scores.This graph shows the difference between the scores given of body size, between males and females. The means of all scores are shown. The graph indicates that overall, in all three body sizes, females rated the image higher than males. The mean for widened images shows that males significantly in particular rated this image lower 3.53 than females 4.63 this is a significant difference. (See table 1)The graph shows the interaction between the mean scores of body shape and gender. Females rated the all body shapes higher than males. The biggest